A Genetic Counselor Responds to “Trig’s Breakthrough”
Thursday, September 25th, 2008A recent editorial in the Washington Post, “Trig’s Breakthrough,” has caused a lot of discussion in the genetic counseling community. It uses Sarah Palin’s youngest child’s entry on the political stage as a platform to address genetic testing. Roxanne Ruzicka, a genetic counselor in Los Angeles and consultant to DNA Direct, sent a thoughtful commentary to the National Society of Genetic Counselors listserv. So, I asked if she would be interested in writing a guest post for this blog.
Guest Post by Roxanne Maas, MS, CGC:
As a genetic counselor, I feel compelled to comment on “Trig’s Breakthrough,” an editorial that appeared on the WashingtonPost.com website on Sept. 10, 2008. The editorial, by Michael Gerson, contained disappointing and disturbing inaccuracies about the role of genetic counselors and the purpose of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. His misinterpretation of the goal of genetics professionals’ work feels like a stab in the heart; I chose this career to support and assist people who have or are at risk for genetic conditions, not to try to eradicate them from the world.
I take issue primarily with three main points Mr. Gerson made:
1. Mr. Gerson stated “Last year the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended universal, early testing for Down syndrome — not just for older pregnant women.”
This is false. ACOG recommended that all pregnant women be OFFERED prenatal screening, which is for a variety of conditions, not only Down syndrome. Women have every right to decline prenatal screening, and some do. However, those that have prenatal screening usually find out that their baby has a very low chance for a severe problem. Then the screening results provide reassurance and lead most women NOT to undergo prenatal testing, such as amniocentesis. Women who receive a positive screening test result then undergo genetic counseling to discuss the implications of the results. Some opt for diagnostic prenatal testing and some do not. Any and all testing is entirely the choice of each woman and the genetic counselor’s role is to help the patient understand the tests and make their own decision about which tests, if any, to have.
2. Mr. Gerson stated that “When Down syndrome is detected through testing, many parents report that genetic counselors and physicians emphasize the difficulties of raising a child with a disability and urge abortion.”
I cannot speak to what some physicians tell patients, but genetic counselors always strive to present a balanced view of the positive and negative aspects of any genetic condition. We have extensive training in non-directiveness and our goal is to enable each patient to make the decision that is best for them, in light of their beliefs and circumstances, not to push for “eugenic abortion.”
3. Mr. Gerson also stated “If traditional Democratic ideology means anything, it is the assertion that America is a single moral community that includes everyone. How can this vision possibly be reconciled with the elimination of children with Down syndrome from American society?”
First, in my 12 years working in the medical field, I have not met a single person who is trying to “[eliminate] children with Down syndrome from American society.” As I stated above, genetic counselors and all of the other medical professionals I have met strive solely to enable their clients to make the best decisions for themselves, not to promote a personal agenda or rid the world of people with disabilities.
Second, a community that includes everyone by definition includes those that would choose to continue a pregnancy with Down syndrome or another genetic condition and those that would choose not to. Such a community would not shun and berate individuals who, for any of myriad reasons, wish not to live through several more months of a pregnancy that has been diagnosed with a genetic condition or commit themselves to a life caring for a child they feel they will not be able to handle. At the same time, such a community should fully support those that elect to follow through with any pregnancy.
In a tolerant society, people of all beliefs and people who would make different decisions can live together and respect each other, even if they would not make the same decision. You may never be able to truly walk a mile in someone else’s shoes to fully understand their motivations and decisions, but you can respect them.
Roxanne Maas, M.S., CGC
Los Angeles, CA
Talk
Technorati Tags: 


Home
