<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinions on 23andMe, deCODEme, Navigenics: Personal Genomics Services</title>
	<link>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/26/opinions-on-23andme-decodeme-navigenics-personal-genomics-services/</link>
	<description>Guidance &#38; Decision Support for Genomic Medicine</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ramunas</title>
		<link>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/26/opinions-on-23andme-decodeme-navigenics-personal-genomics-services/#comment-73108</link>
		<dc:creator>ramunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/26/opinions-on-23andme-decodeme-navigenics-personal-genomics-services/#comment-73108</guid>
		<description>Thank you Lisa for informative post! Surely, condition-oriented testing+counseling have and will have their advantage. But if I like to know my own predisposition to T2D, I would seriously questioned testing only for one TCF7L2 variant, or choose collection of TCF7L2, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/2B, PPARG, HHEX, SLC30A8, IGFBP2 and KCNJ11 genes (and more for the rest 16 conditions) for a triple price...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Lisa for informative post! Surely, condition-oriented testing+counseling have and will have their advantage. But if I like to know my own predisposition to T2D, I would seriously questioned testing only for one TCF7L2 variant, or choose collection of TCF7L2, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/2B, PPARG, HHEX, SLC30A8, IGFBP2 and KCNJ11 genes (and more for the rest 16 conditions) for a triple price&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
