<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: deCODEme: First &#8220;Genetic Scan&#8221; Launches</title>
	<link>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/16/decodeme-first-genetic-scan-launches/</link>
	<description>Guidance &#38; Decision Support for Genomic Medicine</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Lee</title>
		<link>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/16/decodeme-first-genetic-scan-launches/#comment-71999</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/16/decodeme-first-genetic-scan-launches/#comment-71999</guid>
		<description>Hi ramunas, I actually think quite the opposite. The press that these new companies are receiving is increasing people's general awareness of genetics, risk and health. Many people may not be interested in these SNP scans, but the awareness might drive them to more significant risk issues that they are worried about -- such as a cancer risk, or blood clotting risk, that's based on personal and family history.

Also, these new companies have explicitly stated that their test results are not meant to be used as medical information. People who want to do so may need follow-on testing -- to confirm a risk, to provide screening, to provide diagnosis, etc. For these people, clinical consulting services that can explaining someone's genotype in context of their personal history, family medical history, and lifestyle and environmental factors will be what makes all this testing useful and not just noise. That's where companies like DNA Direct come in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ramunas, I actually think quite the opposite. The press that these new companies are receiving is increasing people&#8217;s general awareness of genetics, risk and health. Many people may not be interested in these SNP scans, but the awareness might drive them to more significant risk issues that they are worried about &#8212; such as a cancer risk, or blood clotting risk, that&#8217;s based on personal and family history.</p>
<p>Also, these new companies have explicitly stated that their test results are not meant to be used as medical information. People who want to do so may need follow-on testing &#8212; to confirm a risk, to provide screening, to provide diagnosis, etc. For these people, clinical consulting services that can explaining someone&#8217;s genotype in context of their personal history, family medical history, and lifestyle and environmental factors will be what makes all this testing useful and not just noise. That&#8217;s where companies like DNA Direct come in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramunas</title>
		<link>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/16/decodeme-first-genetic-scan-launches/#comment-70396</link>
		<dc:creator>ramunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 06:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://talk.dnadirect.com/2007/11/16/decodeme-first-genetic-scan-launches/#comment-70396</guid>
		<description>Lisa, I think these new genome scan/sequencing emerging companies/services could seriously reduce clients for single gene tests, which companies like DNAdirect are offering. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, I think these new genome scan/sequencing emerging companies/services could seriously reduce clients for single gene tests, which companies like DNAdirect are offering. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
